[Abstract] [Full Text PDF] (in Japanese / 2164KB) [Members Only And Two Factor Auth.]

J.Jpn. Surg. Soc.. 93(9): 1036-1039, 1992


Report on the annual meeting

THE CONTROVERSY ON THE TREATMENT OF AORTIC DISSECTION

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan

Nobuyuki Nakajima, Seiji Adachi, Motomi Ando, Mitsuru Nakatani, Yasunaru Kawashima

It is obvious that there are many controversies regarding to the treatment of aortic dissection. In this report, we discuss following points such as 1) classificantion, 2) thrombosed type dissection, and 3) simultaneous graft replacement of ascending and aortic arch with the reconstruction of cervical branches.
From the patho-morphological status, dissection will be classified into two types, localized and extended types. From the anatomical and surgical points of view, it will be also classified as 1) ascending-arch, 2) descending-thoracoabdominal, and 3) abdominal. With the combination of these two, dissection will be classified more clearly. The thrombosed type will be incorporated into localized type. We have experienced 76 cases of this dissection, and clinical features and outcome by medical treatment only are presented. The simultaneous reconstruction of ascending aorta and aortic arch for the dissection at ascending-arch type was undertaken in total of 35 patients. The surgical results as well as follow up data are presented and the benefit of this extended procedure is presented as well.


<< To previous pageTo next page >>

To read the PDF file you will need Adobe Reader installed on your computer.